tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post4635133177382936664..comments2024-03-27T01:58:22.445-07:00Comments on The Gazetteer: The PavCo FOI Paradox...Who Is Responsible For The Other 11%?RossKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07677239332112652522noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-65385733209583553492013-02-22T09:16:00.326-08:002013-02-22T09:16:00.326-08:00Lew--
Very much agree with your comment regarding...Lew--<br /><br />Very much agree with your comment regarding Mr. Good.<br /><br />Back when I still listened to the Ledgie Boys, I don't know how many times I heard him say that BC Rail didn't matter because Gordon Campbell was re-elected in 2005 and 2009.<br /><br />How's that for a rationale for NOT getting to the bottom of things.<br /><br />But, then again, what do I know...After all, I'm just a member of a <a href="http://pacificgazette.blogspot.ca/2009/01/if-youre-concerned-about-railgate.html" rel="nofollow">'cult'.</a><br /><br /><br />.RossKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07677239332112652522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-3755581992379947722013-02-22T08:13:45.812-08:002013-02-22T08:13:45.812-08:00'old news' is not....'
A Bill Good ma...'old news' is not....'<br /><br />A Bill Good mantra if ever I heard one...<br /><br />At any rate, these guys don't seem to understand that there is often more "new" news in the old news they didn't report properly than there is in the "new" news they are currently glossing over. You get it; pity they don't...Lewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-57787080836905925362013-02-21T22:11:21.179-08:002013-02-21T22:11:21.179-08:00Here's the link to one of Mr Holman's post...Here's the <a href="http://www.publiceyeonline.com/archives/003682.html#more" rel="nofollow">link to one of Mr Holman's posts involving the matter mentioned above.</a>RossKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07677239332112652522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-12870925147677241412013-02-21T22:10:27.649-08:002013-02-21T22:10:27.649-08:00Thanks Grant.
_____
Excellent point Lew - have y...Thanks Grant.<br /><br />_____<br /><br />Excellent point Lew - have you mentioned that over at Mr. Mackin's place?<br /><br />_____<br /><br />NVG--<br /><br />I'd forgotten about that massive ream of blank paper that Ian received....It's like 25 empty 'On The Road' scrolls!<br /><br />_____<br /><br />Lew II--<br /><br />I think it might also have something to do with this 'old news' is not....<br /><br />News, I mean.<br /><br />You hear that from them a lot. <br /><br />To be fair, Sean Holman used to say the same thing to me occasionally.<br /><br />_____<br /><br />cfvua--<br /><br />Speaking of Mr. Holman, he often opined on how much more open and transparent the FOI process was/is in the State of Washington...Remember, that's how he got the<a rel="nofollow"> FOIable goods</a> on a certain group of (not so) progressive types who were lobbying down there based on promises of access up here to various and assorted sundry five-ringed thingies n' stuff.<br /><br />. <br /><br />RossKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07677239332112652522noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-10963706625258023282013-02-21T13:32:49.392-08:002013-02-21T13:32:49.392-08:00"In their minds"??? Aren't these min..."In their minds"??? Aren't these minions equipped with a photocopier or some electronic method of document transmittal that would satisfy these requests? Any request for information that "in my mind" should be on a wide open website for all to see. After all, nothing underhanded or offside or that might not be in the public's best interest would ever be suggested, letalone done by these shepherd's of the public purse, would it?? Snark fully on and intentional. And the excuse that "it's a large volume of work" doesn't fly as that is what paper pushers are paid for, isn't it?cfvuanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-49945183148761779192013-02-21T11:44:13.157-08:002013-02-21T11:44:13.157-08:00It’s obvious the vaunted MSM is not filing FOI req...It’s obvious the vaunted MSM is not filing FOI requests on this. And they aren’t complaining that Coleman won’t talk to them about it. Which must mean that they know all the details. So why aren’t they reporting said details?<br /><br />Maybe they think that would be "ridiculously frivolous"?Lewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-86221531581774752822013-02-21T10:16:24.139-08:002013-02-21T10:16:24.139-08:00Pavco FOI applications
.3 + 10.7 + 89 = 100
anony...Pavco FOI applications<br /><br />.3 + 10.7 + 89 = 100<br />anonymous + Ian Reid + Bob Mackin<br /><br />Any chance of having Ian telling us how many pages he received in whole and ignore the fact that a large percentage of them are Redacted as in the results by Ian on BC Rail?<br /><br />If we knew, just that one figure being provided by Ian, the public would be able to ascertain, how many Bob Mackin has received at 89%.<br /><br />Maybe Bob could give us the heads up too, just to confirm that Rich Coleman is Right or Wrong, whether Coleman is an Outright Liar! Lying to the Legislative Assembly is a felony.<br /><br /><i>Open government the BC Liberal way, part whatever<br /><br />Posted on April 13, 2012 by Ian <br /><br />More BC Rail pages pouring out of government today – <a href="http://therealstory.ca/2012-04-13/bc-liberals/open-government-the-bc-liberal-way-part-whatever" rel="nofollow">2,968 to be precise</a> – of which <b>2,963 were redacted in whole…</b><br /><br />“Pages 1 through 1314 redacted for the following reasons: - S14<br /><br />“Pages 1319 through 2968 redacted for the following reasons: – S14″<br /><br />On top of a BC Rail public inquiry, I’d say there should be a complete audit of the FOI process</i>North Van's Grumpshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17571810726275726952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-76929441150616319622013-02-21T09:49:09.181-08:002013-02-21T09:49:09.181-08:00Seems to me that the fact Bob Mackin made 89% (or ...Seems to me that the fact Bob Mackin made 89% (or any) requests under FOI is personal information that the public body is not authorized to reveal without Mr. Mackin's consent. Pavco and its Head may have contravened the Act by revealing it.Lewnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-39820709894103338412013-02-21T09:47:38.520-08:002013-02-21T09:47:38.520-08:00Yes indeed, the need to know..
Speaking of BC Rai...Yes indeed, the need to know..<br /><br />Speaking of BC Rail..<br /><br />Timing is everything..<br /><br />Another law suit directly related to BC Rail, a law suit that will end up on a new Government`s desk..<br /><br /><br />http://www.250news.com/blog/view/27571/1/brink+launches+suit+against+bcr+propertiesGrant Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11944976348166120530noreply@blogger.com