tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post1628159661984469209..comments2024-03-27T01:58:22.445-07:00Comments on The Gazetteer: This Day In Clarkland...Hey, Rubes!...Get Your Site C Blue Ribbon Propagammon Here!RossKhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07677239332112652522noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-69644839458571658502016-10-12T18:56:23.704-07:002016-10-12T18:56:23.704-07:00That's just Dandy, Jim!That's just Dandy, Jim!scotty on Denmannoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-30564042009810140282016-10-11T21:37:26.419-07:002016-10-11T21:37:26.419-07:00My "independent" view of the site today ...My "independent" view of the site today illustrated that, yes, a large amount of money is being spent on preventing the North bank from sliding into the river. An activity that is most likely being absorbed by the contractor, or so the report would indicate. Not really likely however in the real world of admitted lack of geotechnical knowledge of the site. Much money is made on overages moved due to inadequate geotechnical informaytion. <br />As the site has been studied and mostly rejected back in the day of Jumpin Jack Weisgerber, any claimed lack of this knowledge on BCHydro's behalf could be considered negligence. The fact that excavators are again working in the flowing water after DFO admonished the corporation earlier this year would indicate further negligence. So much for fall spawning window. <br />At what point will ratepayers/taxpayers get that this project will be the largest driver of rate increases in the history of BC Hydro?<br />More visuals of this should be out soon. Mr Wakefield has a good piece in the Dawson Creek Mirror which highlights the disclaimer statement of the somewhat conflicted report writers. Readers need to review photos on Laila's site for reference to the newer ones,when they appear. cfvuanoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7229885.post-7234428481915089652016-10-11T21:31:21.092-07:002016-10-11T21:31:21.092-07:00If you cant control the message just bypass BCUC?
...If you cant control the message just bypass BCUC?<br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com