TheWrittenWordVille
First, from the invitation/contract of Sept 27, 2007 from RCI, signed, as shown above, by Ms. Christy Clark:
"...Upon accepting our invitation to join the board of PGEI as founding Chair, you will be appointed on an annual basis with an annual director and chairmanship fee renumeration totaling CAD $12,000 to be paid in installments of $4,000 every 4 months, with the first payment being paid within 120 days following your initial appointment..."
Second, what Ms. Clark 'said', without any documentary back-up whatsover, at the British Columbia Legislature, as recorded by the VSun's Rob Shaw, about her 'non-involvement' in the RCI subsidiary, the Pacific Gateway Education Inc. (PGEI):
...“I never did any work for the company, I wasn’t paid by the company, I never attending any meetings at the request of the company, and as far as I know the company never really got off the ground...”
****
So...
If the company 'never got off the ground', how to explain the letter that was sent from RCI to the University of New Brunswick on April 2nd, 2008, some 185 days AFTER Ms. Clark signed the above described invitiation/contract, that included the following written words:
"...PGEI whose founding chair is former B.C. deputy premier and education minister Christy Clark, has developed an innovative and turn-key business model designed to undertake large-scale recruitment of international students in partnership with a Canadian public university..."
Now...
Given all that...
And given Ms. Clark's penchant both for 'saying anything' and for running paperless investigations while in government, is it not incumbent upon her to actually produce some paper now?
Specifically, paper saying that the 'invitation/contract' was dissolved before April 2, 2008.
Otherwise, given the written wording in said invitation/contract (i.e. first payment within '120 days') and the fact that the letter from the parent company was written more than 180 days later claiming that Ms. Clark is the founding chair....
Well?
_______
Invitation/Contract from the Twittmachine feed of the fellow who broke the story...Matthew Millar.
This notion of paper v. meaningless mutterings came up on the comment threads to a previous post courtesy Paul Willcocks (who is back in Lotusland!)...
That third man thing is still coming, promise (think 'conflicty')...
.








