Sunday, December 31, 2006

BC Rails 'R Us

TheWheelsOfJustice
GrindingSlowlyVille



As the obfuscatory dung flung at the BC Rail fraud case thickens, it is important to remember what the charges actually are.

So, as a public service we reprint a redacted version here, courtesy one of the legally adroit Anon-O-Mice that frequent Mary's very fine house of Citizen Journalism:

HMTQ v. BASI, Aneal
Charges:

011 - accepting bribe as government official

012 - breach of trust by public officer

HMTQ v. BASI, Udhe S.

Charges:

001 - accepting bribe as government official

003 - accepting bribe from person dealing with government

005 - offering to influence government official

007 - breach of trust by public officer

009 - fraud over $5,000.

010 - fraud over $5,000.


HMTQ v. VIRK, Bobby S.

Charges:

002 - accepting bribe as government official

004 - accepting bribe from person dealing with government

006 - offering to influence government official

008 - breach of trust by public officer

009 - fraud over $5,000.
010 - fraud over $5,000.

Two counts against two of the men in more detail:
Count 9

Udhe Singh (Dave) BASIS and Bobby Singh VIRK, between the 1st day of April, 2002 and the 28th day of December, 2003, at or near Victoria, or elsewhere in the Province of British Columbia, did by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, defraud Canadian National Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Railway, CIBC World Markets Inc., and the Government of British Columbia, of an amount exceeding $5,000.00, by recklessly putting at risk the bidding process for the Freight Division of BC Rail in disclosing to interested third parties confidential government documents and confidential government information including Cabinet confidences, contrary to Section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code.


Count 10

Udhe Singh (Dave) BASIS and Bobby Singh VIRK, between the 1st day of January, 2003 and the 28th day orf December, 2003, at or near Victoria, or elsewhere in the Province of British Columbia, did by deceit, falsehood or other fraudulent means, defraud(1)Macquarie North America Ltd. and OmniTRAX Inc.,(2)a consortium which included Canadian National Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Railway and the Vancouver Port Authority,(3)TD Securities Inc., and(4)the Government of British Columbia, of an amount exceeding $5,000.00, by recklessly putting at risk the bidding process for the Port Subdivision of BC Rail in disclosing to interested third parties confidential government documents and confidential government information including Cabinet confidences, contrary to Section 380(1)(a) of the Criminal Code.



See the word 'grow-op' in there anywhere?

Me neither.

_____
Image courtesy of the very interesting 'Live Steaming' site.
Also, if you need a primer to get ready for the coming (we hope) 'Trial of the Century', Bill Tieleman has a number of his previous posts archived here.
The complete text of the charges can also be found archived at Sean Holman's place where you still won't find any reference to a grow-op, or Mary Jane for that matter.

.

No comments: