...The ferry itself took damage to the portside door, which means having a replacement part made and flown in from Germany...
{snippety doo-dah}
...It’s really odd that the company finds itself in the position of having to have door parts made abroad.
Crew tell me the new ferries “cost us a lot” in parts and maintenance. They say the deal made for the vessels with the German yard was kind of like buying a Porsche, where you can’t go out later and buy parts of your choice. You have to get them flown in, at whatever price the seller chooses, and you can’t make them yourself, because you haven’t negotiated any patents. So for some other ships in the fleet, engineers can machine new parts. On the Coastals, the bow doors are a different design that lifts the door and then slides it on a roller. When it works, it’s really slick. But when it gets hit, the damage is huge. It’s a heavy door but a fairly light track system, and that and the cylinders that lift the door are what gets ruined when the door gets whacked, the engineers say. That’s when you get stuck with a month-long wait and a big bill for parts.
And that’s where you find yourself when you go for the kind of contract Ferries signed for the German newbuilds. Great on the front end: good price, lots to brag about, on time and on budget. The bills come in later....
7 comments:
Nice work. Totally correct and you called it almost word for word nearly 8 years ago. Great to point out again that the complicit and obviously overpaid, if they are paid anything at all lamestream media couldn't catch a cold letalone chase a story.
Thanks cfvua--
Sometimes I think I should have just stopped after six months, changed the headers and just rolled everything out over and over and over again player piano style.
(this actually came up yesterday when a reader suggested as much when I wrote the dissection of the KMiller Salmon paper in Science....I dunno...Should we just schlep off to Sheep Ville?)
.
No. I mean no schlepping off. Keep up the investigative exposure that shows how things are really being manipulated. Just so we know for next election.
We just got an ema from the good gov indicating that they want to eliminate escort vehicles for oversize loads on the most deadly section of highway in the northeast. Don't the people that will be endangered in a blowing snowstorm have families or does their safety come in second place now??
Oh boy.
What's the explanation?
Cost cutting?
Doesn't this kind of stuff make everyone up there burn when they think of how much money was spent on that new roof on the marshmallow?
.
Thats because sport is king, over any social problem. I wonder how many people stayed home to watch "a game" instead of getting out and voting. We all are responsible for the government we have. Maybe (but I doubt it) people will start to take some responsibility for getting educated and start voting responsibly.
Gg--
You are right, of course.
If we all knew as much about our MLA as we know about Luongo's flop 'n slop style we'd be much better off in about a million ways.
.
No explanation. The good bureaucrats just sent out notice of a proposed "pilot" to eliminate escort vehicles for oversize loads on all LCV ( long combination vehicle) routes in BC. Most of which are in the lower mainland and are four lane. They are strangely asking for comment. Hwy 2 from BC/AB to Dawson Creek has the highest fatality count of any section of road in the Northeast where there is no four lane(almost). Many escort vehicles accompany loads entering from nearby AB service centers where they are not required, to work in BC, effectively deadheading and adding to costs. If Hired from BC there is no additional cost incurred with current regs. We are not sure what is the trigger for this experiment with traffic safety.
Post a Comment