This time it would appear that Ron is only being Obvious to himself:
I know that the good Mr. Mason wrote a couple of truly hard hitting pieces on the Premier's graftiness in the Globe and (NoLongerEmpire) Mail awhile back.
And for that you have to give him his due.
But he also wrote a piece were he wondered why the citizenry of British Columbia just doesn't get it.
Which brings us to the matter of who is or, more to the point, who should be embarrassed about the fact that it is a stringer for the far away Grey Lady who is calling out the graftiness for what it really is (i.e. influence peddling).
Because the BC Liberals sure aren't.
Embarrassed that is.
After all, their cynical innoculatory Friday afternoon 'get out front of the story' graft-dump demonstrated that in spades.
But shouldn't the local proMedia members that work for establishments like PostMedia, Global, CTV, CBC, etcetera, be well and truly embarrassed by the NYTimes call out given that they simply refuse to connect the dots between the massive donations and the deeds and actions of the premier and her BC Liberal government?
And, speaking of 'calling' folks out.....
Instead of making excuses for them, why hasn't Mr. Mason himself called out said local proMedia members for their failure to fully educate the citizenry of our fair province on the importance of a matter that he clearly understands to be an affront to the democratic process?