IdleThis!
Lotusland
The most eclectic and eccentric Great Auntie Bertha asks a most excellent series of questions:
Vancouver has a bylaw that limits idling one's car to no more than 3 minutes.
How many tickets could bylaw enforcement issue if they just stood at drive-through windows?
How much more CO2 do we release into the air every time we use the drive-through window instead of parking the vehicle and going inside to purchase our fast food and drink?
Is it really faster to use the drive-through? How would the environment benefit if all drive-through usage ceased?
Which got me to thinking about this time the girls and I pulled into the parking lot of the Arcata California Motel 6 late one summer evening not so long ago.
After we checked in I walked across the street to the local Carl's Jr so that I could pump my kids full of hormones and antibiotics (just this once!) while they watched old Cosby Show re-runs on that TVLand thing (just this once or twice!).
I mean, there was no reason to re-fire up the VW (not-so)Microbus with the canoe-on-top just to go across the street to the all-night drive through, right?
Wrong.
Because when I walked up to the empty window they refused to take my order.
It was against security regulations to serve hamburgers to ambulatory amblers I was told, repeatedly, before they finally threatened to call the local constabulary.
While it was never made clear to me whether or not this edict came from Homeland Security, I could not help but wonder if it had more to do with discouraging homeless people than curtailing the activities of terrorists and/or gangbangers.
Regardless, I'm with GAB when she says:
I will never use another drive-through. I challenge all who read this to make the same commitment. Our environment deserves it.
'Nuff said, eccentric or otherwise.
OK?
.
Sunday, August 12, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment