Wednesday, June 07, 2023

Gloom Over Gotham.

FromTheArcticToTheBigApple
InTwoStepsVille



It turns out that here is bit of a debate going on between climate scientists about whether the greenhouse gas-fuelled loss of Arctic sea ice is just really bad or if it is actually really, really, really (i.e. never fixable) bad.

Essentially, some groups have been suggesting that we're doomed no matter what, while the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has come to the conclusion that doom can be staved off, at least in terms of the complete loss of the Arctic ice during the summer months, if we move to a 'low' carbon emission scenario as opposed to ending up in either an 'intermediate' or a 'high' emission state.

In contrast to the IPCC's conclusion, the following is from a near-top-of-the-science-geek ladder paper published earlier this week in Nature Communications  by a Korean/German/Canadian group:

...(W)e project an ice-free Arctic in September (by 2050) under all scenarios considered. These results emphasize the profound impacts of greenhouse gas emissions on the Arctic, and demonstrate the importance of planning for and adapting to a seasonally ice-free Arctic in the near future...


Now, I'm not sure about you but in my mind's eye at least, the prospect of an Arctic sea completely free of ice at the end of every summer is mind-boggling.

And then there is the fact that, regardless whether all or just most of the ice melts,  the massive volume of fresh water going in the ocean is going wreak havoc on global weather patterns:

...Prof Seung-Ki Min, of Pohang University, South Korea, who led the new study (described above), said: “The most important impact for human society will be the increase in weather extremes that we are experiencing now, such as heatwaves, wildfires and floods...


Which, given that weather extremes have already become the new normal, brings us to the terrible wildfire situation that is currently raging out of control in late spring Northern Quebec:

People who had to leave their homes due to fires burning across northern and western regions of Quebec will not be able to return to their communities until next week, says Premier François Legault.

Legault, speaking at a news conference Wednesday morning in Quebec City, said dry weather and strong winds are creating dangerous conditions and heavy smoke in areas that have been evacuated so far...


And where is all the smoke from those wildfires going?

You guessed it:

The Federal Aviation Administration on Wednesday halted flights bound for New York’s LaGuardia Airport as smoke from Canada’s wildfires cut visibility in the area.

“The FAA has taken steps to manage the flow of traffic into the New York City area due to reduced visibility from wildfire smoke,” the agency said in a statement. “Flights bound for LaGuardia International Airport have been paused. Flights to Newark Liberty International Airport have been slowed.”...


Of course, if and/or when the smoke shuts down the Banksters' ability to take off from their East River heliports so that they can get out to the Hamptons for the weekend in 30 minutes or less, maybe then we'll get somewhere.

Maybe.


_____
Tip-O'-The-Toque
to the always great, almost daily,  links round-up over at Greg Fingas' Accidental Deliberations.


.

6 comments:

Grant G said...

Good news? "MORE: It is understood that Mr Trump's last White House chief of staff,
@MarkMeadows
, has agreed to plead guilty to several lesser federal crimes in exchange for his testimony under a limited grant of immunity."

Here it comes....check out the thread

https://twitter.com/AndrewFeinberg/status/1666528383659036672

Grant G said...

The lower mainland..it's only June...That is, I believe, 5 straight years with deadly fine particulate filled smokey air...

Climate change? Global warming? Man induced?....Yes to all three.

But why has the fire and deadly heat events spiked so much in the last 1/2 dozen years?

Something I wrote about, talked about.....The fracking revolution, methane from nat gas n fracking operations around the world....All those big talking politicians and lobbyists for big energy who falsely claimed the frak gas and LNG was clean(er) than coal...no, it isn't.

And no, i'm not bragging about being right....i'm angry at those in power who refused facts in favor of spin....LNG riches will flow like magic.....Enjoy your summer staying inside because the air is harmful...worse than smoking.

Well done Christy Clark....John Horgan deserves a big assist too.

Cheers Eyes Wide Open

Trailblazer said...

The article comes as no surprise.
Here in BC I meet the Fort McMurray types that have made their fortunes working the TARSANDS, NO it's not the fucking oilsands.
These workers speak we glee at the fortunes they made whilst fleeing the toxic environment they have caused to live in the 'somewhat' cleaner more environmentally liveable Vancouver Island, BC.
@ Grant;
Clark and Horgan caved to the oil and gas industry just like the conservatives we so chastise!
As with the USA, we have the best governments money can buy.
here on Vancouver Island the road from the east coast to the west coast has been closed because of wild fires!
This is possibly the first time.
It raised eyebrows!!
Reality is ever so slowly sinking in!!!

TB

Grant G said...

Truth Details

Trending
Avatar
Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Page 1: The corrupt Biden Administration has informed my attorneys that I have been Indicted, seemingly over the Boxes Hoax, even though Joe Biden has 1850 Boxes at the University of Delaware, additional Boxes in Chinatown, D.C., with even more Boxes at the University of Pennsylvania, and documents strewn all over his garage floor where he parks his Corvette, and which is “secured” by only a garage door that is paper thin, and open much of the time.



Scotty on Denman said...

The cultural climate is changing, but probably not fast enough to avert global climate change which, remind, includes not only the atmosphere but the hydrosphere, too. That last one kinda snuck up on us, but I got a real bad feeling when I learned, just a few years ago, that shellfishers have to keep their larval starts in the brood tank for an extra month in order they grow a critical amount of shell—that is, of sufficient mass to ‘weather’ the increased acidity of ocean water. I thought, “holy shit! The oceans are huge. How long did it take for that much CO2 to dissolve into it? Whatever, I reckon it’ll take a long time to undo—after we somehow stop pumping more CO2 into the air first.

What about the lithosphere? I used to omit the oceans, but does human industry somehow degrade the very rock we live upon as well? What about fracking-caused earthquakes? And what about CO2 “sequestration”? And nuclear waste? Out of sight, out of mind?

I’m wary because as climate-change is becoming irrefutable, erstwhile deniers are beginning to spout about—if rather rote—SNRs, “blue hydrogen,” and sequestration—but little about emission caps, tar-sand tailing-pond and orphaned well-head clean-up. It’s as if Big Bitumen is paying these individual workers to say these things in this way (equal parts insincerity and hubris) instead of paying into the communal pot to ameliorate what needs to be. The UCP openly intends to reduce personal taxes even further and all but absolve Big Petroleum from cleaning up its own mess, massive profits notwithstanding. Who will pay for it?

Anonymous said...

F for forest management ?
Icarus in Ottawa? Trudeau?