TheArtOfTheHerOwnPrivateImpossible
TotalDestructionPoliticsVille
NW's Shane Woodward has the
'apology':
Sorry.
That from the Premier after former Liberal MLA and a man she ran against for the leadership of the party was vetoed from a promised post at the eleventh hour.
“The communication with George was terrible. It was an example of really really poor communication.”
As for who is ultimately responsible for the decision, Christy Clark said “I take responsibility for the mess with the communications around it particularily with respect to George.”...
So.
Ms. Clark will apologize for not quite getting the spin right.
But she will not apologize for throwing a massive spanner into the treaty process in British Columbia.
How come?
Well, the VTC's Lindsay Kines has that non-apology
apology:
...Premier Christy Clark said her cabinet vetoed the appointment of former Liberal minister George Abbott as chief of the B.C. Treaty Commission because her government wants to reform the entire treaty process.
Clark said cabinet decided to stop investing in a system that has cost $600 million and produced just four treaties in 22 years. “We have to be able to move faster and we have to find a way to include more First Nations in the process,” she said. “Fifty out of 200 First Nations involved in the process? That’s not enough. So it was a policy decision … not to appoint a treaty commissioner...
Thus, it would appear that the way to fix things is to do your best to destroy them.
Then, later, just like with say auditing, public education, ferries, pharmacare policy, regional transit strategies, apprenticeship programs, gaming, resource management and on and on and on, even the smallest of tiny 'fixes' down the road can be trumpeted as generational changes or some such codswallop.
Hey.
Here's a thought.
Maybe a Premier who's only real skillset involves the art of the spin b/w blunderbuss really was sorry about messing up both.
Because, when consultative governance does not matter to you or yours (and we're not talking about cabinet here, but rather Ms. Clark's wizards and patrons), it really is kinda crummy and sadfacey when your blown spin shines a wee bit of light on the fact that your real goal is to just blow things up that are inconvenient for said wizards and patrons.
****
Now, you might think I'm being too harsh on Ms. Clark et al.
But if the politics of total destruction is not the wizards' and the patrons' game you would think that Ms. Clark would have a plan now that she and hers have wrecked everything.
Right?
Wrong.
Again, from Mr. Kines VTC
piece:
...“In terms of next steps — whether or not the treaty commission will be changed, whether or not it will continue to exist, how all that future will unfold with respect to treaties — is going to be something that we do together with First Nations.” ...
Sheesh.
_______
And the weird thing about the firing of the good Mr. Abbott, who really did seem to be working at being truly consultative and inclusive?....Well...He was once, it would appear, at least some of the wizards' and patrons' Horse 1A.....But that was back in the dark days, I suppose, when everything was a 20-to-1 shot, at best and back-up plans were needed everywhere.
.