TheTriangulatory
ConundrumVille
While I do not agree that it was the right thing to do, from a political perspective I can see why (razor thin) minority government leader John Horgan made the decision to go all in on continuing with the Site C damn.
First, it helped to keep the business bund at bay.
Second, there was that matter of good jobs and increased economic activity in a part of the province where he and his are routinely stomped electorally.
Third, by supporting Site C and the dam-dependent sparkle pony dreams of LNG, Mr. Horgan was able to avoid being dubbed Dr. No by the usual suspects.
But now that it is becoming increasingly clear that Site C will be a longterm economic disaster regardless whether it can even be completed successfully, Mr. Horgan and the Dippers are in a bind.
As are folks like, say, me, who support a lot of what their government is up to.
So.
Is there a way out of this conundrum?
Well, what if we got serious about other projects, made and run by us, not shysters, that could generate any and all power we will need down the road at lower costs on a whole lot of levels.
Norm Farrell notes that this is approach is being tried in Egypt,
right now:
...Two near-shore (wind power) projects are under construction in the Gulf of Suez. One by Lekela Power, another by Vestas. The basic details are here compared to Site C:
The budget for Site C will probably exceed the amount shown above. Bureaucrats and politicians never hide good news and BC Hydro has been unwilling to release details of engineering challenges that required redesign of important project segments.
The cost of abandonment has grown substantially since 2017 but continued spending does not guarantee Site C will ever contribute anything to BC’s power grid...
Clearly, something has to be done.
Would it be easier for Mr. Horgan et al. to do the hard thing if they had a majority government?
Perhaps.
_____
Why didn't I mention the 'sunk costs' issue, above?...Well, personally, I think that has been more an excuse than a real reason from the beginning...But I could be wrong about that.
And why isn't Norm choosing projects that add up to the power that 'will' be produced by Site C?....Because, as Norm has made clear, the need for all that Site C power is actually unjustified.
.