Thursday, May 14, 2009

Mulroney v. Schreiber.....The Thumbs Have It.

DoesTendinitisThisWay
ComeVille



If you are not reading Kady O'Malley you are not getting the real deal:

11:27:12 AM
Interesting: Not even an hour in, and (Team Mulroney counsel Guy) Pratte has already raised a – not an objection, but the gentle suggestion that (Oliphant Commission counsel Richard) Wolson give his client more context when reading from the transcript; which is fine by him, really, as it turns out — the two go a few more rounds before landing on a question that asked Mulroney about his relationship with Schreiber *after* leaving office – again, a fairly open-ended question – and those meetings where, according to Mulroney "Then" (ie. during the 1996 investigation), he had a cup of coffee with the man, but according to "What Actually Happened" (ie. the 2009 Oliphant Commission), he also received $75,000 in cash....

(stuff in brackets and "Then/What Actually Happened" airquotes mine)


Wow.

Here's hoping La ITQ never comes down with a repetitive BBerryBanging injury.

And if she ever gets hooked on that bloody, stoopid twittermoronic '140' that means absolutely nothing at all (and which apparently has David Akin in its evil clutches*), we are doomed.



____
Although, to be fair, Mr. Akin has reportedly decided to cut back on his Facebook Friends because he has, get this!, too many.

.

No comments: