DingdongVille
From the Twittmachine feed of the good Mr. Baldrey:
Gosh.
Does this mean we can look forward to Mr. Baldrey taking one of the big three outlets 'round here to task, with crazy-legged grammar and everything, when they publish stuff he doesn't like?
Oh.
Wait.
I forgot.
There is a Club.
(and, of course, you and I and the other 'idiots' are not in it so we should just keep our thoughts and opinions to ourselves, or some such thing)
_______
Thanks to reader 'spartikus' for the tip.
Previous Keef Reports can be found....Here.
.
7 comments:
I guess he doesn't watch Global tv.
For a guy who makes a living using words, Baldrey sure seems to waste a lot of time on Twitter, where he runs out of his allotment before leaving his adjective jar.
If he had any intestinal fortitude he’d write a column or two in one of the exclusive media club outlets employing him, detailing specific examples to support his snit de jour. There he could use actual sentences and string his world-shaking informative thoughts together in paragraphs. Snarky, non-specific, rhetorical questions aren’t the mark of a credible journalist.
Nor are years of never doing any investigative journalism and actually breaking a story.
Those would be kind words to describe Baldrey's time in the MSM.....
I almost wrote "career" but then thought that he's just been collecting dust while barely hanging on...
PS.... Can rabbleca join Christy's wedding friend in filing a lawsuit ?
Guy in Victoria
Libel or slander or defamation of character?
Try explaining this one
http://commonsensecanadian.ca/liberals-big-projects-often-double-cost-site-c-dam-different/
I quit reading pretty well anything he writes. I see the name and go elsewhere. The guys an idiot. Plan and simple. Goes for his colleague Fletcher as well.
"Snarky, non-specific, rhetorical questions aren’t the mark of a credible journalist."
Don't tell me somebody considers Keef Balderdash a "credible journalist........I can't believe that!
Post a Comment